|
| First
| 2 | 3
| 4 | 5
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
| Last |
4.2 Execution
and Funding Arrangement
As mentioned
in the above institutional arrangement, ISG is attached to MARD-ICD, therefore
MARD takes the responsibility of the executing agency and ICD the implementing
agency.
Since it is
envisaged that the funding of ISG will be jointly contributed from several donors,
the option of a trust fund administered and managed by MARD-ICD is proposed.
That is the way to integrate the ISG process in MARD in a sustainable manner.
The Secretariat
will prepare a year plan and liquidity planning which will be approved by the
Steering Board, and then funds can be disbursed. Reporting will follow one format
that the contributing donors will accept; the reporting includes - work plan,
budget, quarterly and annual activity and financial reports. If the reporting
should follow each of the contributing donors’ requirements it will make the
reporting too cumbersome and inefficient.
The financial
reports should be detailed enough to make it possible to see the cost for the
various activities, thus, serving as a management tool and making it possible
to assess the efficiency of the operations. Delegation of authority, responsibility
and reporting should basically follow the present ISG format. Since considerable
authority over funds is delegated, annual external auditing of the accounts
and procedures is a prerequisite.
4.3 Duration
It is envisaged
that the first step of the new phase of the ISG will cover a two-year period.
Nearly end of the second year, the new phase shall be planned involving all
stakeholders concerned and the budget is then made, enabling a continuation
of activities for the whole new phase. This planning shall incorporate the
experiences, developments and other co-ordinating initiatives that have occurred
during the operation of the first step.
4.4 Risks
and assumptions
A successful
implementation of the ISG depends on several key assumptions. The major risk
of the ISG is related to the formulation, development and implementation of
policies and strategies in rural development and that these are in turn translated
into development programmes. Without a function policy framework and strategy
for rural development the ISG has only a small, if any, role to play. The evaluation
of the ISG indicates that the need for policy framework and strategy has been
recognised by the Government.
Another risks
regarding the ISG process is related to the process and dialogues itself. It
is necessary the process be not turned into meetings where the various stakeholders
only present their positions regarding policies, priorities and programmes.
The ISG requires a real dialogue between the parties concerned regarding development
and harmonisation of policies and strategies. In view of that, TAGs have significant
role in the preparation for substantial dialogues.
From the above
follows that the ISG project is dependent on the realisation of true coordination
- inter and intra ministerial, between government and donor and between donors
- in the formulation phase of a programme development. This is based on the
policy and strategies that have been developed as part of the ISG.
The ISG project
implementation makes a major assumption that the parties are willing to openly
exchange information on ongoing and pipeline projects/ programmes, priorities,
policies and strategies. In this respect the ISG could serve as a catalyst in
achieving an open exchange of information and showing the benefits related to
information sharing.
Finally, in
view of ISG process sustainability, there must be a direct involvement not only
of the ICD Director himself as ISG Secretariat Director, but also of his deputies
and progamme officers. That involvement may contribute to raise initiatives
for TAG studies, synthesise experiences from several projects/programmes and
exchange of information on external support utilization.
5 Financing
Although the
core of the work is envisaged to be voluntary participating in meetings, there
is a need to finance the Secretariat, the cost of the meetings and TAG studies.
It is suggested at this stage that financing should be provided for two years
of operation, which besides the costs for meetings, TAG and Secretariat, also
include funds for short-term consultants - local and international, and planning
costs. During these to years the final structure of the ISG process should be
developed including the establishment of trust fund within the MARD:
The short-term
consultants will support the work of the TAGs’ work with technical and policy
expertise when needed. It is also proposed that a yearly monitoring is conducted
to ensure that the ISG-process is effective and are following the objectives
and activities agreed upon at the onset.
The country
contribution will compose of: office and office equipment, the service of the
ICD director and his deputies, a financial clerk and the expenses of local tele-communication.
5.1 Financial
management
At present
the ISG funds and managed under MRDP financial system. It is suggested, in this
proposal, that the ISG process will continue to be financed under MRDP while
an ISG trust fund, capable of handling funds from several donors, is established
under MARD. The financial management arrangement, with MRDP, is temporary and
should not continue longer than up to July 2001, bur may be terminated earlier
if a trust fund structure is established. Thus the establishment of a functional
trust fund structure should be completed before July 2001.
5.2 Current
system: ISG financial linkage with MRDP
Presently
ISG process is financed solely by Sida through the system for support to MRDP.
It is suggested in this proposal, that during a transition period, while the
ISG trust fund is established, other donors could contribute funds to ISG through
the same channels. Below follows a short description of the present Sida - ISG arrangement.
| First
| 2 | 3
| 4 | 5
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
| Last |
|